VA Claims Research & Decision-Support Platform
The only platform that connects VA claims from initial decision to final judgment — and shows what actually wins. Search 1,850,000+ BVA decisions, CAVC appeals, 38 CFR regulations, and M21-1 policy with AI-powered analysis.
Analyze Your BVA Denial
Paste any BVA decision and get a per-issue breakdown, evidence gap analysis, and a draftable argument outline — grounded in 1.85M+ real cases and government sources.
Features
- BVA Decision Search — 1,850,000+ Board of Veterans Appeals decisions from 1992 to present
- CAVC Appeal Tracker — Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims docket with real-time updates
- 38 CFR & M21-1 Policy — Browse regulations, diagnostic codes, and rating criteria
- Claim Theory Builder — Test claim theories against all authority sources with AI analysis
- Precedent Finder — AI-powered precedent discovery across BVA and CAVC databases
- Authority Conflict Detection — Identifies contradictions across BVA, CFR, and M21 sources
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does the data come from?
All data comes directly from official government sources: BVA decisions from va.gov, CAVC docket from the Court's eFiling system, CFR from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, and M21 policy from the VA's KnowVA system.
Is this for veterans or for attorneys?
Both. Veterans can understand their own claims. VSOs, accredited agents, and attorneys get deeper research tools including advanced search, AI-powered case analysis, docket tracking, and alerts.
Precedent Finder
Search 1,850,000+ BVA decisions and CAVC appeals by describing your claim scenario in plain language. AI identifies controlling legal principles and generates targeted search queries across multiple angles simultaneously.
How It Works
- Describe your scenario — condition, theory of entitlement, or specific legal situation
- AI identifies controlling legal principles and generates targeted search queries
- BVA and CAVC databases are searched across multiple angles simultaneously
- Expand any result to see how the case was framed — issues, evidence, reasoning, regulations