VA Claims Research & Decision-Support Platform

The only platform that connects VA claims from initial decision to final judgment — and shows what actually wins. Search 1,850,000+ BVA decisions, CAVC appeals, 38 CFR regulations, and M21-1 policy with AI-powered analysis.

Analyze Your BVA Denial

Paste any BVA decision and get a per-issue breakdown, evidence gap analysis, and a draftable argument outline — grounded in 1.85M+ real cases and government sources.

Features

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does the data come from?

All data comes directly from official government sources: BVA decisions from va.gov, CAVC docket from the Court's eFiling system, CFR from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, and M21 policy from the VA's KnowVA system.

Is this for veterans or for attorneys?

Both. Veterans can understand their own claims. VSOs, accredited agents, and attorneys get deeper research tools including advanced search, AI-powered case analysis, docket tracking, and alerts.

Why Your Knee Rating Increase Might Be Denied: Lessons from BVA Decisions

Unlock patterns in BVA knee condition denials. Learn what evidence is crucial for a higher rating, range of motion, and how to strengthen your claim.

The Big Picture

When veterans search for answers about their knee disability claims, especially for rating increases or denials related to range of motion, the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) database can offer insights. Our search for 'knee condition denied rating increase range motion' yielded 20 decisions. However, a closer look reveals a critical detail: the BVA database often returns results based on broad keyword matches, meaning many of these decisions were not primarily about knee conditions at all. Out of the 20 decisions, only 5 directly addressed knee conditions, rating increases, or specific limitations like range of motion. The remaining 15 cases covered a wide array of other conditions (like PTSD, migraines, GERD), effective dates, or Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) claims. This highlights a common challenge in navigating VA appeals: the complexity and interconnectedness of various claim types. For the 5 knee-specific cases, the pattern was predominantly denial (4 out of 5), often citing insufficient evidence to warrant a rating higher than 10 percent or to prove specific limitations in flexion or extension. One case, however, resulted in a grant for an earlier effective date and a 20 percent rating for a meniscal tear, demonstrating that success is possible with the right evidence. This analysis, while based on a small sample of knee-specific cases, underscores the importance of precise medical documentation and a clear understanding of VA rating criteria for knee conditions.

Denial Patterns

What Wins These Claims

Evidence Strategy

Analyze My Denial | Browse All Articles

Research Tools