VA Claims Research & Decision-Support Platform

The only platform that connects VA claims from initial decision to final judgment — and shows what actually wins. Search 1,850,000+ BVA decisions, CAVC appeals, 38 CFR regulations, and M21-1 policy with AI-powered analysis.

Analyze Your BVA Denial

Paste any BVA decision and get a per-issue breakdown, evidence gap analysis, and a draftable argument outline — grounded in 1.85M+ real cases and government sources.

Features

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does the data come from?

All data comes directly from official government sources: BVA decisions from va.gov, CAVC docket from the Court's eFiling system, CFR from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, and M21 policy from the VA's KnowVA system.

Is this for veterans or for attorneys?

Both. Veterans can understand their own claims. VSOs, accredited agents, and attorneys get deeper research tools including advanced search, AI-powered case analysis, docket tracking, and alerts.

Denied Earlier Effective Dates for PTSD and Neuropathy — Why Timing Matters

Learn why a veteran was denied earlier effective dates for PTSD and neuropathy, and how the timing of claims and evidence impacts your VA disability benefits.

What Happened

The veteran served on active duty from 1965 to 1968. Years later, in May 2013, they filed a claim for service connection for PTSD. This initial claim was denied in December 2013 because there was no PTSD diagnosis at the time, and the veteran did not appeal that decision, making it final. Fast forward to May 2023, the veteran filed another claim for PTSD, which VA granted, making the effective date May 19, 2023. Then, in January 2025, the veteran filed claims for increased disability ratings for their PTSD and several peripheral neuropathy conditions. While the veteran eventually received an overall 100% disability rating, which included increased ratings for these conditions and led to eligibility for Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) housebound benefits and Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA), they appealed to get *earlier effective dates* for these benefits and *higher ratings* for the period *before* January 30, 2025. The Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) reviewed the case under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA) and could only consider evidence available up to the May 2025 decision from the local VA office. The BVA denied all requests for earlier effective dates and higher ratings for the periods prior to January 30, 2025, finding that the evidence did not support the requested changes for those specific timeframes. The claim for Total Disability Rating Based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU) was dismissed because the veteran was already rated 100% disabled.

Why the VA Denied It

What Would Have Won

This case highlights the critical importance of understanding effective dates and the evidence required for specific time periods. To have won an earlier effective date for PTSD, the veteran would have needed to either appeal the initial 2013 denial within the one-year window, or demonstrate that the 2013 claim was improperly denied due to a clear and unmistakable error, or that there was an unadjudicated informal claim with a diagnosis of PTSD prior to May 2023. Since the 2013 claim became final, VA could only grant service connection from the date of the new claim in 2023. For the increased ratings and associated benefits (SMC, DEA), the key was showing that the *increased severity* of PTSD and neuropathy existed *before* the January 30, 2025, claim date. The Board found the severity increased *after* this date. A winning strategy would have involved submitting medical evidence (doctor's notes, C&P exams, diagnostic tests) and detailed lay statements from the veteran and others that specifically described the worsening of symptoms and functional limitations *prior to* January 2025. This evidence needed to directly address the rating criteria for the higher percentages, such as demonstrating total occupational and social impairment for PTSD or more severe paralysis for neuropathy, for the period being claimed. Additionally, under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA), the Board could only consider evidence that was part of the record at the time of the May 2025 local VA decision. If the veteran had new, relevant evidence that wasn't considered, the correct path would be to file a Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) to ensure that evidence is reviewed by VA.

The Rule From This Case

Your effective date for benefits is usually the date VA receives your claim, or the date your entitlement arose, whichever is later; ensure your evidence clearly shows the severity of your condition *at or before* that specific date.

Evidence Checklist

Analyze My Denial | Browse All Articles

Research Tools