How current is the BVA database?

BVA decisions are indexed as they're published on va.gov, covering decisions from 1992 to present. CAVC docket data refreshes automatically and includes all cases filed in the current and previous year.

What does the AI analysis actually do?

The system generates a plain-English summary, searches for relevant BVA decision passages, looks up applicable diagnostic codes and CFR sections, and finds related M21 policy guidance. Every insight includes clickable citations to the original government source.

Can I use this for my own VA claim?

Yes. The free tier gives you access to search BVA decisions, browse CAVC dockets, and read CFR regulations. V2V is an information tool, not a substitute for legal advice.

What's included in the free tier vs. Pro?

Free: 3 case views and 1 AI analysis per session. Pro ($29/month): unlimited case views, unlimited AI analysis with citations, full BVA decision text access, docket alerts, and Federal Register monitoring.

VA Claims Research & Decision-Support Platform

The only platform that connects VA claims from initial decision to final judgment — and shows what actually wins. Search 1,850,000+ BVA decisions, CAVC appeals, 38 CFR regulations, and M21-1 policy with AI-powered analysis.

Analyze Your BVA Denial

Paste any BVA decision and get a per-issue breakdown, evidence gap analysis, and a draftable argument outline — grounded in 1.85M+ real cases and government sources.

Features

BVA Decision Search — 1,850,000+ Board of Veterans Appeals decisions from 1992 to present
CAVC Appeal Tracker — Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims docket with real-time updates
38 CFR & M21-1 Policy — Browse regulations, diagnostic codes, and rating criteria
Claim Theory Builder — Test claim theories against all authority sources with AI analysis
Precedent Finder — AI-powered precedent discovery across BVA and CAVC databases
Authority Conflict Detection — Identifies contradictions across BVA, CFR, and M21 sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does the data come from?

All data comes directly from official government sources: BVA decisions from va.gov, CAVC docket from the Court's eFiling system, CFR from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, and M21 policy from the VA's KnowVA system.

Is this for veterans or for attorneys?

Both. Veterans can understand their own claims. VSOs, accredited agents, and attorneys get deeper research tools including advanced search, AI-powered case analysis, docket tracking, and alerts.

Back Pain Wins 40%, But Many Other Claims Denied: A BVA Case Study

Discover how one veteran secured a 40% rating for lumbar spine DJD but faced denials for higher ratings and other conditions. Learn what evidence was missing.

What Happened

This case involves a veteran who was fighting for higher disability ratings for numerous service-connected conditions and earlier effective dates for several grants. The veteran had a wide range of issues, including Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV), hypothyroidism, lumbar spine degenerative joint disease (DJD) after fusion, spinal stenosis, radiculopathy in both upper and lower extremities, shoulder strains, tinnitus, cervicogenic headaches, and a scar. One of the initial challenges was a reduction in the veteran's BPPV rating from 30 percent to 10 percent, which the VA determined was due to a 'clear and unmistakable error' (CUE) in an earlier decision. The veteran sought to restore this 30 percent rating and also appealed for higher ratings for almost all of their other conditions. Additionally, the veteran requested earlier effective dates for several newly service-connected conditions and for the 40 percent rating for their lumbar spine. While the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) denied most of the veteran's requests for higher ratings and earlier effective dates, there were two significant positive outcomes. The BVA granted a 40 percent disability rating for the veteran's lumbar spine DJD status post fusion. Furthermore, the BVA determined that the veteran was entitled to an earlier effective date of October 4, 2012, for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA), finding that the veteran had been entitled to a total disability rating from that date.

Why the VA Denied It

BPPV reduction was proper: The VA found a 'clear and unmistakable error' (CUE) in a previous decision that had granted a 30% rating for BPPV. The BVA agreed, stating the original 30% rating was based on an incorrect application of rules to the medical facts at the time. The veteran's current symptoms did not include 'occasional staggering' which would support a higher rating.
Radiculopathy not severe enough for higher rating: For radiculopathy in the right upper extremity, left upper extremity, and both right lower extremity (femoral and sciatic nerves), the BVA found the evidence did not show the condition was 'severe.' For the left lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy, it was not found to be 'moderate.' These findings mean the symptoms didn't meet the criteria for a higher percentage.
Shoulder strain not severe enough for higher rating: The BVA found that the veteran's left and right shoulder strains with muscle weakness did not show severe enough limitation of motion to warrant a higher rating. Specifically, the evidence did not show flexion and/or abduction limited to 25 degrees for the left shoulder or 45 degrees for the right shoulder.
Cervicogenic headaches not 'prostrating': To receive a compensable rating for headaches, they generally need to be severe enough to cause 'prostrating attacks' (meaning they force you to lie down). The BVA found the evidence did not support this level of severity for the veteran's cervicogenic headaches.
No earlier effective dates for most conditions: For many conditions, the veteran sought an effective date earlier than July 23, 2020. The BVA found that this date was when the veteran submitted the 'original claim' for service connection or a higher rating for these specific conditions. Without an earlier claim or evidence of an earlier informal claim, the effective date cannot be moved back.

What Would Have Won

The veteran successfully secured a 40 percent rating for lumbar spine DJD status post fusion because the evidence showed 'limitation of flexion of the lumbar spine to less than 30 degrees.' This specific objective measurement directly aligned with the VA's rating schedule criteria for that condition. This highlights a crucial strategy for veterans: providing clear, objective medical evidence that directly matches the language and requirements of the VA's rating schedule (38 C.F.R. Part 4). To have won higher ratings for other conditions, the veteran would have needed to provide more specific and objective evidence. For instance, for radiculopathy, instead of just stating it was 'severe,' the veteran would need medical documentation of specific nerve damage, muscle atrophy, or frequent incapacitating episodes. For shoulder conditions, precise range of motion measurements showing severe limitations are key. For headaches, detailed lay statements describing 'prostrating attacks' (where the pain forces you to stop all activity) are essential, supported by medical records of such episodes. For earlier effective dates, the strategy is to meticulously search for any evidence of an earlier 'original claim' or 'informal claim.' This could be an old VA form, a letter to the VA, or even medical records from years ago that clearly documented the condition and could be interpreted as an intent to file a claim. The win for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) effective date demonstrates that the BVA *will* grant earlier effective dates when the evidence (in this case, entitlement to a total disability rating from an earlier date) supports it.

The Rule From This Case

To win or increase your VA disability rating, you must provide objective medical evidence and detailed lay statements that specifically describe your symptoms in a way that directly matches the VA's rating schedule criteria.

Evidence Checklist

[critical] Medical Records (C&P Exams, Private Doctor Notes): These are essential. Ensure your medical records, especially from Compensation & Pension (C&P) exams, accurately reflect your symptoms, limitations, and diagnoses. If private doctor notes provide more detail, submit them.
[critical] Range of Motion Measurements: For musculoskeletal conditions like back pain and shoulder strains, precise measurements of your joint movement (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction) are vital. These measurements are directly used by the VA to assign ratings.
[important] Lay Statements (Your Own Testimony): Your personal statement is crucial for describing the frequency, duration, and severity of your symptoms, and how they impact your daily life and ability to work. Be specific about 'prostrating attacks' for headaches or 'occasional staggering' for BPPV if applicable.
[important] Nerve Conduction Studies / EMGs: For radiculopathy (nerve pain), these tests can provide objective evidence of nerve damage, which strengthens your claim for a higher rating.
[helpful] Buddy Statements / Witness Statements: Statements from family, friends, or fellow service members who have witnessed your symptoms and their impact can corroborate your own testimony and add weight to your claim.
[critical] Evidence of Earlier Claims: For earlier effective dates, search for any old VA forms, letters, or medical records that could be interpreted as an 'original claim' or 'informal claim' for the condition, even if it was years ago.

Analyze My Denial | Browse All Articles